|
46.
Did God Become
Man?
|
Did God
Become Man? (part 1 of 5): A Natural Belief in God
|
Description: The Belief in One God and service to
Him is one which is inherent in all humans.

The vast majority of human beings have always believed
in God. From the most ancient civilizations to the
most primitive of modern societies, religions with
God at their center have formed the foundation of
human culture. In fact, the denial of God’s
existence (atheism) throughout history was limited
to a few individuals until the rise of communism in
the 20th century. Even today, in the secular societies
of the West, where modern social scientists armed
with Darwinian theories have argued that God is merely
a figment of the human collective imagination, the
overwhelming majority of citizens, laymen and even
scientists, hold steadfast to their belief in God.
Consequently, the overwhelming body
of archeological data in support of God’s existence
has led some anthropologists to conclude that belief
in God (deism) must be inborn and not learnt. Although
the vast majority of social scientists proposed otherwise,
recent scientific discoveries appear to support the
minority view that deism is innate. In an article
entitled “God Spot is found in the Brain,”
Dr. Vilayanur Ramachandran of the University of Ca
lifornia at San Diego said that the phenomenon of
religious belief in God is hardwired into the brain.
|
‘God Spot’ is Found in
Brain
by Steve Connor
Science Correspondent
SCIENTISTS believe they have discovered
a “God module” in the brain, which could
be responsible for man’s evolutionary instinct
to believe in religion.
A study of epileptics, who are known
to have profoundly spiritual experiences, has located
a circuit of nerves in the front of the brain, which
appears to become electrically active when they think
about God.
The scientists said that although
the research and its conclusions are preliminary,
initial results suggest that the phenomenon of religious
belief is “hardwired” into the brain.
Epileptic patients who suffer from
seizures of the brain’s frontal lobe said they
frequently experience intense mystical episodes and
often become obsessed with religious spirituality.
A team of neuroscientists from the
University of California at San Diego said the most
intriguing explanation is that the seizure causes
an over-stimulation of the nerves in a part of the
brain dubbed the “God module”.
“There may be dedicated neural
machinery in the temporal lobes concerned with religion.
This may have evolved to impose order and stability
on society,” the team reported at a conference
last week.
The results indicate that whether
a person believes in a religion or even in GOD may
depend on how enhanced this part of the brain’s
electrical circuitry is.
Dr. Vilayanur Ramachandran, head of
the research team, said the study involved comparing
epileptic patients with normal people and a group
who said they were intensely religious.
Electrical monitors on their skin
– a standard test for activity in the brains
temporal lobes – showed that the epileptics
and the deeply religious displayed a similar response
when shown words invoking spiritual belief.
Evolutionary scientists have suggested
that belief in God, which is a common trait, found
in human societies around the world and throughout
history, may be built into the brain’s complex
electrical circuitry as a Darwinian adaptation to
encourage cooperation between individuals.
If the research is correct and a “God
module” exists, then it might suggest that individuals
who are atheists could have a differently configured
neural circuit.
A spokesman for Richard Harries, the
Bishop of Oxford, said whether there is a “God
module” is a question for scientists, not theologians.
“It would not be surprising if God had created
us with a physical facility for belief,” he
said.[1]
|
Despite
growing evidence that man is hardwired with a “physical
facility for belief,” the fact that the concept
of God has varied greatly among human societies still
leads some thinkers, even those who believe in God,
to conclude that religions must be manmade. However,
thorough research reveals a common theological thread
linking the various religions. That link is the belief
in a Supreme Being among the various gods, a monotheistic
foundation that can be found in even the most externally
pantheistic of religious systems. For example, the
concept of God in Hinduism exists as a single example
among many religions, which supports the view that
human beings were originally monotheistic and through
various degenerative processes became polytheistic.
In spite of its many gods and idols, Hinduism has
a single Supreme God above all, Brahman.
Traditionally,
most anthropologists have concluded that religion
devolved from various stages of polytheism to monotheism,
beginning with early man’s deification of the
forces of nature, then, eventually, devolving into
ditheism to consolidate all of the supernatural powers
into two main gods (a god of good and a god of evil),
and, finally, simplifying into a belief in one god,
monotheism.
Thus,
religion, according to anthropologists and social
scientists, has no divine origin; it is merely a byproduct
of the evolution of early man’s superstitions,
based on his lack of scientific knowledge. Hence,
these same theoreticians believe that science will
eventually unlock all of the secrets of nature, resulting
in the disuse of religion to explain natural phenomena,
and, the consequential extinction of religion altogether.
Man’s
innate belief in a Supreme Being, however, seems to
support the opposite view, proposing instead that
man began as a monotheist, but in time, strayed into
various forms of polytheism. This view is further
supported by fact that all of the so-called primitive
tribes, which have been “discovered,”
have been found to hold a belief in a Supreme Being.
No matter what their evolutionary stage of religious
development is found to have been at the time of “discovery,”
most were found to believe in a Supreme God over all
other gods and spirits. As such, the concept of a
single Supreme Being remains in most of the religion’s
as evidence that the masses strayed away from monotheism
by giving some of God’s attributes to other
aspects of creation, which eventually came to be regarded
as lesser gods in some cases and as intercessors in
others. Nevertheless, a Supreme God, in whatever form
He takes, is at the core of most religions.[2]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes:
[1] The Sunday Times, 2 Nov. 97, p. 19.
[2]
As God said in the Quran: “So set you your face
towards the religion, hanifan (steering away from
the association of any others with God), the nature
[framed by] God with which He has created humankind.
No change let there be in the creation of God, that
is the straight religion, but most men do not know.”
(Quran 30:30) – IslamReligion.com
|
Did God Become Man? (part 2 of 5): The Gods, Man is
God, and God Becomes His Creatures |
Description: A look at the concept of God and pantheism
in polytheistic faiths, specifically Hinduism.
The Gods
However, there does remain an aspect of belief in
God which defies all logic and reason, but which has
become a corner stone of faith. It is the belief that
God became man. Where the original monotheistic belief
in God degenerated into a belief that there must be
intermediaries between human beings and the Supreme
Being to either convey human quests or to act on behalf
of God in the world, the intermediaries became objects
of worship. The intermediaries were often conceived
as spirits found in all manifestations of nature.
Consequently, humans from primitive times have worshiped
spirits of the forest, rivers, skies and the earth
etc., until the present time. Occasionally nature
itself was worshiped, and at other times, symbols
representing nature were worshiped. The religious
systems, which evolved from these types of beliefs
tended to be localized and remain scattered among
primitive people around the world till today. Such
beliefs did not converge in the form of a single belief
system of international impact, as far as is known
in the current records of human history.
On
the other hand, where the monotheistic belief degenerated
into the personification of God’s power as separate
intermediary entities represented by images, idols
became a focal point for worshipping God. The powers
of God became gods. Such beliefs have culminated in
ancient and modern times as natural religions of international
impact. Ancient Egyptian, Greek and Roman religions
have died out due to the complete subversion of these
empires by Christianity. However, the Indian expression
of Hinduism survived both Muslim and Christian colonization
and remains the national religion of approximately
one billion people in India. Christianity and Islam,
with exception of Bali in Indonesia, have supplanted
their direct international impact in the majority
of the Far East. However, the different forms of Buddhism,
its offshoot, have become the main religion of hundreds
of millions in the Far East. Different forms of this
Hindu reform movement continue to spread in the West
today.
Man
is God
According to Hinduism, the basic concept is that everything
is God. There is, fundamentally, no distinction between
God and His creation. In Hindu philosophy, every living
being has a self or a soul that is called Atman. It
is generally believed that the soul is actually God,
called Brahman. Consequently, the essence of Hindu
belief is the idea that Atman and Brahman are one
and the same; in other words, the human soul is divine.
Furthermore, human society is divided into castes
or classes, where each caste represents human beings
who came into existence from different parts of the
divine being, Brahman. The upper caste, the Brahmins,
came from the head of God; whereas, the lowest caste,
the Sudras, came from God’s feet. Though there
are officially only four main castes, there are, in
reality, many sub-castes. Each one of the main castes
is subdivided into thousands of lesser castes. Hindus
believe that when a person dies, he or she is reincarnated.
The soul, Atman, of the dead person never dies but
is continually reborn. If people are good in this
life, then they will be reborn into a higher level
of the caste system in their next life. Conversely,
if they are bad in this life, they will be reborn
into a lower level, which is one of the main reasons
why so many Hindus commit suicide annually. Daily,
newspapers regularly record incidents of individuals
and families hanging themselves from fans in their
homes. In a recent edition of one of the local papers,
a Hindu man killed himself when India lost a cricket
match to Sri Lanka. When one’s belief system
espouses reincarnation, suicide becomes an easy route
to evade difficulties in this life.
When
a person reaches the top caste, the Brahmins, after
various re-incarnations, the cycle of rebirth ends,
and he reunites with Brahman. This process of reunification
is called Moksha, and in Buddhism it is called Nirvana[1].
The Atman becomes once again reunited with Brahman.
Thus, man becomes God.
God
Becomes His Creatures
In Hindu belief, the attributes of Brahman are manifest
as different gods. The attribute of creation becomes
the creator god, Brahma, the attribute of preservation
becomes the preserver god, Vishnu, and the attribute
of destruction becomes the destroyer god, Siva. The
most popular one amongst them, Vishnu, becomes incarnate
among human beings at different points in time. This
incarnation is called in Sanskrit avatar, which means
“descent.” It represents the descent of
God into the human world by becoming a human being
or one of the other creatures of this world. Primarily,
the term avatar refers to the ten main appearances
of the god Vishnu. Among them is Matsya, the incarnation
of God as a fish; Kurma as a tortoise; Varaha as a
boar (a wild pig); Narasimha as a half-man, half-lion;
Vamana as a dwarf; and probably the most common one
is Rama, the human incarnation. Rama is the hero of
the epic, Ramayana, about which movies are made and
shown regularly in India. The other popular god is
Krishna, the other incarnation of Vishnu as a human
being. His epic is the Mahabharata, which describes
the descent of the gods in human forms to save the
Goddess Earth, oppressed by demons, burdened by overpopulation
and in danger of dissolution[2]. There are different
variations of this belief regarding how many incarnations
there are and what other animal forms they adopt,
but all generally follow these manifestations. Consequently,
in Hinduism, the belief of one-fifth of humankind,
man is God or part of God. The difference between
the Creator and His creation is only superficial.
Popular
Buddhism shares the Hindu incarnation concept with
its own modifications. It teaches that every conscious
being possesses the “Buddha nature” and
is, therefore, capable of becoming a Buddha. Buddha,
in earlier teachings[3], was truly a human teacher
who lived and taught. However, in Mayahana Buddhism,
the idea of the “eternal” Buddha, embodying
the absolute truth, developed, and Buddha was elevated
to Godhood. In order to reveal his message to humankind,
this eternal Buddha manifests himself from time to
time as an earthly Buddha to live and work among humans.
Thus, Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism,
became just one of the earthly appearances, a phantom
apparition created by the eternal Buddha[4]. Buddhism
incorporated the elements of the Indian system of
the gods and heavens and responded to the popularity
of Bhakti Hinduism, personal devotion to savior deities.
The Absolute or Buddha nature was seen by some as
having attributes manifest as eternal Buddhas and
bodhisattvas[5] who existed in spiritual realms and
offered their merits, protection and help toward enlightenment
to all their followers who were devoted to them.
The
chief ones among the eternal bodhisattvas were Avalokitesvara,
a personification of compassion, and Manjusri, a personification
of wisdom. And among the eternal Buddhas were Aksobhya
(the Imperturbable), Amitabha (Eternal Light) and
Amitayus (Eternal life).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes:
[1] This is a Sanskrit term meaning “blown out,”
referring to the extinction of all worldly desires,
or salvation. Though the term originated in Vedantic
writings (Bhagavad-Gita and the Vedas), it is most
often associated with Buddhism. In Hinayana Buddhism
the term is equated with extinction, while in Mahayana
Buddhism it is a state of bliss (Dictionary of Philosophy
and Religion, p. 393).
[2]
The theological centerpiece of the epic is the Bhagavad
Gita (Dictionary of World Religions, p. 448).
[3]
Theravada Buddhism, Doctrine of the Elders, is essentially
a discipline, which an individual practices in order
to achieve salvation for himself by himself. Only
monks who have the stamina and will power to live
the strenuous religious life can reach this goal,
and one who achieves it is called an arhant. There
are two types of Nirvana, one with residue and one
without. The first is achieved by the arhant here
and now, the five aggregates (skandhas: which comprise
all individuals; matter, sensation, perception, predisposition
and consciousness) are still present, although the
cravings that lead to continued rebirth are extinguished.
Nirvana without residue refers to the state of the
arhant after death about which the Buddha remains
silent. There can only be one Buddha in an eon and
enlightenment is reserved for an elite few. This aspect
of Buddhism is called Hinayana, or Lesser Vehicle.
With
the passage of time after the Buddha’s death,
Theravada monks were criticized as being too narrow
and individualistic in their teachings. Dissensions
arose and Buddhism evolved. A new form, Mahayana,
or Great Vehicle, came to dominate. (Dictionary of
World Religions, pp. 126-127)
[4]
Dictionary of World Religions, p. 129.
[5]
Originally this term referred to former Buddhas while
they were still in their quest for enlightenment.
In Mahayana the bodhisattva postpones his final complete
enlightenment and attainment of nirvana in order to
aid all other beings in their quest for enlightenment.
(Dictionary of World Religions, p. 112).
|
Did God Become Man? (part 3 of 5): God Becomes One
Man, Men Become God, Why? |
Description: Examples of the religions which believe
that God became one man, that all humans are a part
of God, and a look into the reasoning of all these
beliefs previously mentioned.
God Becomes One Man
Christian belief in God’s incarnation has its
origins in the beliefs of the ancient Greeks. The
very terms used to describe God becoming Man exist
in the Gospel of John 1:1 & 14, “In the
beginning there was the Word (logos) and the Word
was with God and the Word was God.” Then the
author of John goes on to say, “...And the word
became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and
truth...” Although the Greek term logos is translated
as “word,” there is no single English
term equivalent to it. Its importance lies in its
use as a technical term in Greek metaphysical thought
from the sixth century B.C., until the third century
C.E., and in its appropriation by both Jewish and
Christian thinkers. It first appeared in the expressions
of Heraclites (540-480 B.C.) as the motivating principle
of the universe, but was, by Aristotle’s time,
supplanted by the immaterial power nous and made the
material power. Logos reappeared in the system of
the Stoics who termed their principle of teleology
both logos and God. Philo (d. 50 C.E.), a Jewish Alexandrian
philosopher, identified the creative word of the Old
Testament with the logos of the Stoics. The logos
thus became a transcendent principle, as the means
by which God expresses Himself in the world. But logos
also had a redemptive function; it was the means to
a higher spiritual nature. In the Gospel of John,
the logos are both creative and redemptive; the latter
aspect is given greater emphasis than the former.[1]
This
belief required a reason, for which the concept of
original sin and divine sacrifice were invented. It
was claimed that due to the sin of Adam, which accumulated
down the generations until it became so great that
no human sacrifice could remove it, a divine sacrifice
was needed. Consequently, God had a human son, who
was God, Himself, incarnate. God’s son later
died on a cross as a sacrifice for all humankind to
God, Himself. The son, who is God, Himself, was later
resurrected and currently sits on the right side of
God’s throne waiting to judge humankind at the
end of this world. So for Christians, also one-fifth
of humankind, God became a man at one and only one
point in the history of this world, and belief in
His incarnation is essential for salvation.
Men
Become God
From the perspective of Jesus’ humanity, the
Christian belief that he is God could be perceived
as elevating a single human being to the status of
Godhood. There is, however, another body of beliefs
among many of the followers of Islam, which, like
Hinduism and Buddhism, offer human beings the opportunity
to become God.
The
origin of their beliefs can be found in mysticism
whose roots are in ancient Greek mystery religions.
Mysticism is defined as an experience of union with
God and the belief that man’s main goal in life
lies in seeking that union. The Greek philosopher
Plato proposed this concept in his writings, particularly
in his Symposium. In it he describes how the human
soul can climb the spiritual ladder until it finally
becomes one again with God.[2] The basis of this belief
is the teaching that human beings are, in fact, parts
of God that have become trapped in this material world.
The physical body cloaks the human soul. Consequently,
the soul in their view is divine. The trapped part
of God in this world must free itself from the material
world and reunite with God.
There
arose among Muslim people, a sect, which promoted
this very same idea. Its followers are traditionally
called “Sufis” and their system of beliefs
is called “Sufism”. This term is usually
translated into English as “mysticism”
or “Islamic mysticism.” It is based on
the same concept as that of the Greek mystics –
that the human soul is divine and that the way that
it becomes reunited with God is through certain spiritual
exercises. Various groups of Sufis evolved into cults
called “Tareeqahs” (ways or paths). Each
cult was named after its actual or supposed founder,
and each had its own set of special spiritual exercises
which members had to strictly adhere to. Most taught
that after the followers performed the prescribed
spiritual, emotional and physical exercises, they
would become one with God. This oneness was given
the Arabic title fanaa, meaning “dissolution”[3]
or wusool, meaning “arrival.” The concept
of “unity with God” was rejected by mainstream
Muslim scholars but was embraced by the masses. In
the tenth century, a Sufi devotee, al-Hallaaj (858-922),
publicly announced that he was God and wrote poems
and a book called Kitaab at-Tawaseen to that effect.
In it he wrote, “If you do not recognize God,
at least recognize his sign; I am the ultimate absolute
truth because through the truth I am eternal truth.
My friends and teachers are Iblees[4], and Pharaoh.
Iblees was threatened by the Hellfire, yet he did
not acknowledge anything between himself and God,
and although I am killed and crucified, though my
hands and feet are cut off, I do not recant.”[5]
Ibn
‘Arabee (d. 1240) took the unity with God belief
a step further by claiming that only God exists. He
wrote the following in one of his works, “Glory
be to He, who made all things appear while being their
essence.”[6] And in another he wrote, “He
is the essence of whatever appears, and He is the
essence of what is hidden while He appears. The one
who sees Him is none other than Him and no one is
hidden from Him because He appears to Himself while
being hidden.”[7] His concept is called Wahdatul-wujood
(unity of existence) and became popular in the Sufi
circles throughout the Muslim world.
Why?
What led ancient people to have the belief that the
God became man or that God and man were one and the
same? The fundamental reason was their inability to
understand or accept the concept of God creating this
world from nothingness. They perceived God to be like
themselves, creating from what already exists. Humans
create things by manipulating existing things into
other states, shapes and forms having different functions.
For example, a wooden table was once a tree in a forest,
and its nails and screws were once iron ore in rocks
underneath the earth. Humans cut down the tree and
shaped its wood into a tabletop and legs; they dug
up the iron ore, melted it and poured in into moulds
to produce nails and screws. Then they assembled the
pieces to create a table for a variety of uses. Similarly,
the plastic chairs people now sit on were once liquid
oil, stored deep in the bowels of the earth. One cannot
imagine sitting on oil the way people sit on chairs.
However, through the human ability to manipulate the
chemical components of oil, plastic is produced and
chairs are made for humans to sit on. This is the
essence of human activity; humans already merely modify
and transform what already exists. They do not create
the trees or produce the oil. When they discuss oil
production, they really mean oil extraction. The oil
was created millions of years before by geological
processes; then humans extracted it from the earth
and refined it. They also did not create the trees.
Even if they planted them, they did not create the
seeds that they planted.
Consequently,
human, in their ignorance of God, often conceive of
God as being just like them. For example, in the Old
Testament, it is written, “God created man after
his own image; in the image of God he created Man.”
For Hindus, Purusa is the creator God, Brahma, in
human form, and just as humans create by manipulating
the existing world around them, then the creator god
must do likewise.
According
to Hindu philosophy, Purusa is a giant offspring of
Brahma, having a thousand heads and a thousand eyes.
From him arose Viraaj, his feminine counterpart and
mate in the creation process. The divine Purusa is
also the sacrificial offering (vv. 6-10) and from
his dismembered body arose the four traditional social
castes (varnas).[8] Perusa Hymn states that Brahmins
were Purusa’s mouth; Ksatriyas (noblemen), his
arms; Vaishyas, his thighs; and Shoodras, his feet.[9]
The Hindus’ inability to conceive of God creating
this world from nothing, led them to the concept of
God creating the world from himself and its people
from His body parts.
Human
ability to understand ideas and concepts is limited
and finite. Human beings cannot grasp and understand
the infinite. The belief, which God taught Adam, was
that God created this world from nothing. When He
wanted something to exist, He merely said, “Be!”
and His command brought into existence those things
that did not previously exist. This world and its
contents were not created from Himself. In fact, the
concept of God creating the world from Himself reduces
God to the level of His creatures, who merely create
something from something else. Those who held and
continue to hold this belief are unable to grasp the
uniqueness of God. He is Uniquely One and there is
nothing like Him. If He had created the world from
Himself, he would be like His creatures.
|
Did God Become Man? (part 4 of 5): God Becomes
One Man, Men Become God, Why? |
Description: Why logically the concept of God
becoming a part of His creation contradicts the basic
meaning of the term “God”, and vice versa.
The question which remains
is Did God become Man? Logically speaking, the answer
is no, because the concept of God becoming man
contradicts the basic meaning of the term “God.” People
commonly say that God is able to do all things; whatever
He wants to do, He can do. In the Bible of Christians
it is said, “... through God all things are possible
(Matthew, 19: 26; Mark 10: 27, 14: 36).”
The Quran of Muslims states:
“Indeed, Allah (God) is
able to do all things.” (Quran 2:20)
…and the Hindu scriptures
carry texts of similar meanings.
All the major religious
texts contain general expressions regarding the basic
concept of God’s omnipotence. He is Greater than all
things, and through Him all things are possible. If
this general concept is to be translated into practical
terms, one has to first identify and understand the
basic attributes of God. Most societies perceive God as
an eternal being without beginning or end. If, on the
basis that God is able to do all things, and it was
asked whether God could die, what would be the answer?
Since dying is part of “all things,” can it be said,
“If He wants to?” Of course this cannot be said.
So, there is a problem
here. God is defined as being ever-living, without end,
and dying means “coming to an end.” Consequently, to
ask if He can die is actually a nonsensical question.
It is self-contradictory. Similarly, to ask whether God
can be born, is also absurd because God has already been
defined as eternal, having no beginning. Being born
means having a beginning, coming into existence after
not existing. In this same vein, atheist philosophers
enjoy asking theists: “Can God create a stone too heavy
for Him to lift?” If the theist says yes, it means that
God can create something greater than Himself. And if
he says no, it means that God is unable to do all
things.
Therefore, the term “all
things” in the phrase “God is able to do all things”
excludes the absurdities. It cannot include things that
contradict His divine attributes; things that would make
Him less than God, like, forgetting, sleeping,
repenting, growing, eating, etc. Instead, it includes
only “all things” that are consistent with Him being
God. This is what the statement “God is able to do all
things” means. It cannot be understood in the absolute
sense; it must be qualified.
The claim that God became
man is also an absurdity. It is not befitting of God to
take on human characteristics because it means that the
Creator has become His creation. However, the creation
is a product of the creative act of the Creator. If the
Creator became His creation, it would mean that the
Creator created Himself, which is an obvious absurdity.
To be created, He would first have to not exist, and, if
He did not exist, how could He then create?
Furthermore, if He were created, it would mean that He
had a beginning, which also contradicts His being
eternal. By definition creation is in need of a
creator. For created beings to exist they must have a
creator to bring them into existence. God cannot need a
creator because God is the Creator. Thus, there is an
obvious contradiction in terms. The claim that God
became His creation implies that He would need a
creator, which is a ludicrous concept. It contradicts
the fundamental concept of God being uncreated, needing
no creator and being the Creator.
Can Man Become God?
Man is a finite being (i.e.,
creation). Man is born, and he dies. These are
characteristics which cannot be attributed to God
because they equate Him with His creation. Therefore,
God did not and will not ever become man. On the other
hand, man also cannot become God. The created cannot
become its own creator. The created at one time did not
exist. It came into being by the creative act of a
Creator who always existed. What is nonexistent cannot
make itself exist.
As for the parallel concept
that the human soul or spirit is divine, it is a way of
claiming that man can become God. This philosophy forms
the foundation of Greek, Christian and Muslim mysticism,
as well as Hindu theology, and extends divinity to all
humans and possibly all living creatures. It starts
from the premise that, at some time in the history of
the universe, bits and pieces of God became surrounded
by material bodies and were confined to the earth. In
other words, the infinite became contained in the
finite. This belief attributes pure evil to God and
ultimately eliminates the meaning of good and evil all
together. When the human soul intends evil and does it
by God’s permission, such an act is purely evil and
worthy of punishment. Hence, the concept of karma
was invented. Whatever goes around comes around.
Karma explains inexplicable suffering by claiming
that it is the consequence of evil in a previous life.
God ultimately punishes any evil done by the parts of
Himself within man. However, if human souls have
independent wills from God, they cannot be at the same
time God. Thus, each human becomes himself a god. |