#24
- The Historical Fallacy of Atonement
by Aisha Brown
Salvation can be defined as the deliverance from
sin and its penalties; the path to salvation, however,
varies from one religion to another. In Christianity,
salvation is found through the Doctrine of Vicarious
Atonement. Since human nature is considered in Christianity
to be wayward and sinful, this doctrine states that
Jesus "rendered full satisfaction" to God
for the sins of man through his death and resurrection.
In a nutshell, Jesus took our place, and his death
absolves us of our sins.
This is contrary to what is found in the Torah where
God says: " ...every man shall be put to death
for his own sin" (Deut. 24:16)
The matter of Jesus, as savior of mankind, is refuted
in the Quran, wherein God says that He
"... has stamped them with their disbelief...
for their saying 'We killed God's Messenger, Christ
Jesus, the son of Mary' They neither killed nor crucified
him, even though it seemed so to them..." (4:155,
157).
Salvation According to Jesus
Nowhere in the four gospels did Jesus explicitly
state that he would die to save mankind from sin.
When approached by a man who asked what he could do
to gain eternal life, Jesus told him to keep the Commandments
(Mat. 19: 16,17); in other words, to obey God's Law.
To a similar question put to him by a lawyer, as recorded
in the gospel of Luke, Jesus told him to love God
and his fellow man (Luke 10:25-28).
The role of Jesus is made clear in the Quran where
God says:
"Christ, the son of Mary, was no more than a
Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away
before him...see how God doth make His Signs clear
to them, yet see in what ways they are deluded away
from the truth" (5:75).
The mission of Jesus was not, therefore, to set up
a new method of achieving salvation, much less the
founding of a new system of belief; as even the Bible
points out, Jesus sought only to take the Jews from
their emphasis on ritual back to that of righteousness
(Mat. 6:1-8).
Paul of Tarsus
For the origin of the doctrine of atonement, one
does not go to the teachings of Jesus, but instead
to the words of Paul, the true founder of Christianity;
in teachings of present Christian terms and practices.
Like many Jews, Paul had no use for the teachings
of Jesus, and he himself persecuted the followers
of Jesus for their unorthodox beliefs. This zealous
persecutor was turned into an ardent preacher, however,
through a sudden conversion around 35 CE. Paul claimed
that a resurrected Jesus appeared to him in a vision,
thereby, choosing Paul as his instrument for carrying
his teachings to the Gentiles (Gal. 1:11; 12:15,16).
Paul's credibility in any capacity is questionable,
however, when considering that: (1) there are four
contradictory versions of his so-called "conversion"
(Acts 9:3-8; 22:6-10; 26:13-18; Gal. 1:15-17); (2)
God says, in passages such as Num. 12:6, Deut. 18:20
and Ez. 13:8-9, that revelations come ONLY from Him,
and (3) accounts of numerous disagreements between
the other disciples and Paul regarding his teachings
are recorded in Acts.
Experience and observation had taught Paul that preaching
among the Jews was not feasible; he, therefore, chose
to go to the non-Jews. By doing so, however, Paul
disregarded a direct command from Jesus against preaching
to other than a Jew (Mat. 10:5-6). In short, Paul
set aside the actual teachings of Jesus in his desire
to be a success.
The Pagan Influence
Among the pagans of Paul's time, a wide variety of
gods existed. Although these gods had different names
and were embraced by people from different areas of
the world – Adonis from Syria, Dionysus from
Thrace, Attis from Phrygia, for instance – the
basic concept in each cult was the same: these sons
of gods died violent deaths and then rose again to
save their people.
Since the pagans had tangible savior-gods in their
old religions, they wanted nothing less from the new;
they were not able to accept any sort of an invisible
Deity. Paul was quite accommodating, preaching therefore
of a savior named Jesus Christ, the son of God, who
died and then rose again to save mankind from sin
(Rom. 5:8-11; 6:8-9).
The Bible itself points out the error of Paul's thinking.
While each of the four gospels contain an account
of the crucifixion of Jesus, these accounts are strictly
hearsay; none of the disciples of Jesus were witness
to such, having fled his side in the Garden (Mark
14:50).
In the Torah, God says that one who is "hanged
upon a tree" – crucified – is "accursed"
(Deut. 21:23). Paul side-stepped this by saying that
Jesus became accursed in order to take on the sins
of man (Gal. 3:13); in so doing, however, Paul set
aside the very Law of God.
The resurrection, wherein Paul says that Jesus "conquered"
death and sin for mankind (Rom. 6:9,10), plays such
an important part that one who does not believe in
it is not considered a good Christian (1 Cor. 15:14).
Here, too, the Bible lends little support to Paul's
notions; first of all, not only was there no eyewitness
to the actual resurrection, but all post-resurrection
accounts are in contradiction with each other as to
who went to the gravesite, what happened there, and
even where and to whom Jesus appeared (Mat. 28; Mark
16; Luke 24; John 20).
Secondly, although Christianity states that the body
following resurrection will be in a spiritual form
(1 Cor. 15:44), Jesus had obviously not changed, for
he both ate with his disciples (Luke 24:30,41-43),
and allowed them to touch his wounds (John 20:27).
Finally, as the divine son of God in Christianity,
Jesus is said to share in God's attributes; one cannot
fail to wonder, however, just how it can be possible
for God to die...
In his desire to win souls among the pagans, Paul
simply reworked a number of major pagan beliefs to
come up with the Christian scheme of salvation. No
prophet – including Jesus himself – taught
such concepts; they were authored entirely by Paul.
The Ultimate Sacrifice
Long accustomed to making sacrifices to their gods,
the pagans easily grasped Paul's notion that Jesus
was the "ultimate sacrifice" whose blood
washed away sin. A common ceremony during this time
in various Middle Eastern cults, such as those of
Attis and Mithras, was that of the "taurobolium":
a person descended into a pit covered over with grillwork
upon which a bull (or ram), said to represent the
pagan deity himself, was then ceremoniously slain.
By covering himself with the blood, the person in
the pit below was said to have been "born again"
with his sins washed away.
It is worth noting that the Jews had given up sacrifice
back in 590 BCE following the destruction of their
Temple. Paul's notions, therefore, were in direct
contradiction to both Old Testament teaching (Hosea
6:6) and even to the teaching of Jesus himself (Mat.
9:13) which stressed how God desired good virtues,
not sacrifice.
While Paul stressed that God's "love" was
behind the sacrifice of Jesus (Rom. 5:8), the Doctrine
of Atonement instead shows a harsh Deity satisfied
only by the murder of his own innocent son. Paul was
way off base here, for the Old Testament is full of
references to the love and mercy of God to man (Ps.
36:5-10; Ps. 103:8-17) revealed through His forgiveness
(Ex. 34:6,7; Ps. 86:5-7), of which even Jesus spoke
(Mat. 6:12).
Pagan influence in Christianity even extends to its
sacred symbol. Although Paul calls the cross of Jesus
"the power of God" (1 Cor. 1:18), reference
works, such as the Encyclopedia Britannica, Dictionary
of Symbols, and The Cross in Ritual, Architecture,
and Art point out that the cross was used as a religious
symbol centuries before the birth of Jesus. Bacchus
of Greece, Tammuz of Tyre, Bel of Chaldea, and Odin
of Norway are just a few examples of ancient pagan
gods whose sacred symbol was that of a cross.
Original Sin
Central to the Doctrine of Atonement is Paul's notion
that mankind is a race of wrong-doers, having inherited
from Adam his sin in eating of the forbidden fruit.
As a result of this Original Sin, man cannot serve
as his own redeemer; good works are to no avail, says
Paul, for even these cannot satisfy the justice of
God (Gal. 2:16).
As a result of Adam's sin, man is doomed to die.
By his death, however, Jesus took on the punishment
due man; through his resurrection, Jesus conquered
death, and righteousness was restored. To earn salvation,
a Christian need only have faith in the death and
resurrection of Jesus (Rom. 6:23).
Despite its prominent place in Christianity, the
notion of an "original sin" is not found
among the teachings of any prophet, Jesus included.
In the Old Testament, God says: "... the son
shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither
shall the father bear the iniquity of the son"
(Ez.18:20-22). Personal responsibility is also stressed
in the Qur'an where God says: "... no bearer
of burdens can bear the burden of another... man can
have nothing but what he strives for" (53:38,39).
The doctrine of original sin gave Paul the means
to justify pagan influence in his scheme of salvation.
Irresponsibility became the hallmark of Christianity
through this doctrine, however, for by "transferring"
sins onto Jesus, Christians assume no responsibility
for their actions.
Salvation in Islam
By the seventh century, the doctrines conceived by
Paul had been embellished to the point where Christianity
was not almost entirely a man-made religion. At this
time, God chose to send Muhammad as His Final Messenger
in order to set things straight once and for all for
mankind.
Since God is Almighty, He doesn't need the charade
concocted by Christians in order to forgive man. In
the Qur'an, God says we are all created in a state
of goodness (30:30); He has not burdened man with
any "original sin", having forgiven Adam
and Eve (2:36-38; 7:23,24) as He forgives us (11:90;
39:53-56).
As we are all personally responsible for our actions
(2:286; 6:164) there is no need for a humanly concocted
savior in Islam; salvation comes from God alone (28:67).
Thus did Islam seek to restore the true meaning to
monotheism, for in the Qur'an God asks:
"Who can be better in religion than one who
submits his whole self to God, does good, and follows
the way of Abraham the true in faith?" (4:125;
41:33).
The Religion of Man
The evidence is overwhelming that the concept of
salvation in Christianity – its Doctrine of
Vicarious Atonement – came not from God but
from man via pagan rituals and beliefs.
Paul effectively shifted the center of worship away
from God by saying that Jesus was the divine agent
of their salvation (Gal. 2:20). In so doing, however,
Paul set aside all teachings of God's prophets, and
even the concept of monotheism itself, since God in
Christianity needs Jesus for His divine "helper".
Take a Closer Look
With his very salvation at stake here, the Christian
should take a closer look at what he believes in and
why. God says in the Qur'an:
"O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in
your religion, nor say of God aught but the truth.
Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, was no more than a
Messenger of God... for God is One God; glory be to
Him: far exalted is He above having a son. To him
belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And
enough is God as a Disposer of Affairs." (4:171)
|